Wednesday, January 05, 2005

Pier Head plans


Update from Nick Storer, sent to all interested parties (supporters and objectors).

Following the rejection of our previous plans, and hopefully as an alternative to appealing them, we have worked over Christmas to amend the design to address many of the principal concerns of Local Residents and Councillors; we are convinced the Planning Officers will appreciate the merits of the improved scheme.

* There has been a substantial reduction in the scale and massing of the building on the Pier corner of the site in order to ensure views of The Rookery remain completely unaffected on three sides.

* The detailing and form of the building has been rethought and improved in order to reinforce the stand-alone qualities of the design.

* Greater focus has been given to the context and setting, picking up themes, materials and the diversity of the area, whilst remaining essentially contemporary, exciting and sustainable.

* Although unapparent from the elevations, the building features curved frontages, extensive tinted glazing and a predominantly copper roof instead of slate. The apartment layout remains much as before with a living area above shop/offices, and bedrooms in the roof. Each of the 14 units gets a garage and car space.


Your questions, comments and suggestions are eagerly awaited, prior to further negotiations with Purbeck District Council.

Nick Storer [nickstorer @ pierhead.plus.com]


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Matter was raised at monthly Town Council meeting on 31st January (by, I think Pat Wisley - my apologies if name wrong). She asked for more explanation on why plans rejected that she believed many in town would like to go ahead.

To paraphrase responses, as I understood them:

Mayor said ...we can't just approve a plan because a site is an eyesore. developer has approval for less intensive scheme..this too big..developer can talk to Planners at PDC to see what acceptable..we can't be blamed if he chooses not to develop the plans he has approval for..

Julie Wheeldon said ..quite liked the design....not 'terrible' or anything ...trouble was this just too big ..bulk too great..needed 'air'..mustn't block (listed) Rookery ..problem is there are roads on each side

Colin Bright said..quite liked design on paper..bulk too great ...came right to the edge of the roads..

(Posted by Mike Hadley)